Table showing ScotRail mix & match official recorded station announcements to play for your amusementt

Everything I learned from Scotrail’s automated station announcements

Just occasionally, something good happens on the internet. Jon Brady, a reporter at Scotland’s Daily Record newspaper, tweeted that he’d unearthed a two hour MP3 containing all ScotRail’s automated station announcements. A coder named Matt Eason split them into 2,440 individual MP3s and invited the internet to help transcribe them in a shared document. It took less than two hours. You can find the original MP3 here and the resulting spreadsheet here.

You can play Matt Eason’s ambient music mix, with four different beats to choose from, as well as setting the ScotRail announcement volume, frequency, and delay over (or under) the music.

Some of these pre-recorded messages are full sentences; most, though, are fragments, of the sort that can be reassembled into such things (“We are sorry to announce that / this train / will be diverted to / Aberdeen” and so forth). And the list offers some interesting insights into the sort of things a train operating company covering the whole of Scotland might feel the need to tell people about. For example:

Predictably, weather is a problem

The selection of weather-related reasons for train problems common enough to be pre-recorded as announcements include “fog”, “thick fog”, “heavy rain”, “high track temperatures”, “high winds”, “snow and ice”, and the helpful catch all “severe weather”. Then there are the more specific and more worrying options: “forecasted slippery rails”; “heavy rain flooding the railway”; “ice preventing trains getting electricity from the third rail”; “lightning damaging a train/station/the electricity supply/the signalling system”. Scotland, as will not surprise anyone who’s been there, has a lot of weather. 

Unpredictably, so are a lot of other things

“Bad weather conditions” is one of the things in the section of the spreadsheet categorised simply as “reasons” . So, as it happens, are a lot of other things. “Staff shortages”. “Vandalism”. “Mechanical problems”. “A points failure.” 

So far, so predictable. But then, there’s “A boat colliding with a bridge”; “A chemical spillage near the railway”; “A wartime bomb near the railway”; “Cattle on the railway”; “Overcrowding because of a rugby match” – every one of these, remember, happens frequently enough to have made it worth getting the woman who does the announcements to pre-record them. Exactly how ungovernable are Scotland’s cows?

Then there are the ones that are just unnerving. “A coach becoming uncoupled on a train”. What? Do I need to worry about that now? “A shortage of trains because of accident damage”. How many trains were involved in this accident? What kind of accident are we talking about here? “The sea flooding the railway”. What the actual-

And then there’s “A rail buckling in the heat”. This does not sound like the sort of thing you’re often going to need to worry about in Scotland, but hey, give it ten years.

Announcers need to think about pitch

There’s an automated announcement on London’s bus network that’s always annoyed the hell out of me. The announcement for the “Percy Street” stop pronounces Percy Street with the stress on the second word; this makes it sound like a person, rather than a side street off Tottenham Court Road.

To get around this sort of problem, the ScotRail announcements include various phrases – “engineering work”, the names of rival train operating companies – twice: once with an upward inflection (which sounds right in the middle of a sentence) and once with a downward one (which sounds right at the end). Numbers prefixed with a zero (“oh-one” and so forth) have a third, flat intonation, too.

In the same way, as well as bits running “is delayed by approximately five minutes” and so forth, there’s one that simply says “is delayed”, with a downward inflection strongly communicating “look, we don’t know either, that’s all we can tell you”.

Some thoughts on times, trains, & platforms

Edinburgh Waverley station. Network Rail

The assorted clips allowing ScotRail to say how long you’re going to be waiting for your delayed train to Inverness (”…will be approximately three minutes” and so forth) climb up in increments of one minute until they hit five, then five minutes until they hit 55. This makes sense – relatively few trains run less than hourly, and if one’s more than an hour late you’re beyond recorded announcements, lads – except you can apparently also say “7 minutes” and “12 minutes” too? No other numbers, just those. Weird. 

There are also announcements suggesting you stand well away from platforms 1 to 8. There are definitely stations in Scotland with through platforms with higher numbers than that (Edinburgh Waverley, Glasgow Central): I’m assuming they don’t get any express services, because the alternative is terrifying. (Additional modular announcements, incidentally, also allow you to refer to platforms A to D and zero.)

Trains, meanwhile, can be formed of any number of carriages between one and 12, but there’s also one that lets you fill in the number yourself (“This train is formed of-”). This will be very handy if a train arrives with 13 carriages, or 27, or three and a half.

Some destinations & train operating companies are really baffling

A lot of the discussion of all this on nerd Twitter concerned some of the non-Scottish destinations which the pre-records included, especially Kidderminster. I was all ready to smugly laugh this off, on the grounds that all these places are on the paths of CrossCountry Trains which extend into Scotland, and so might occasionally come up as the source of delays…

…except, that there are some places that definitely aren’t that at all. I can’t work out why a rail announcement at a Scottish station would ever need to refer to, say, Stratford High Street station on London’s DLR. Or Southeastern Trains, which is in there with several different brandings and intonations, despite being at the very farthest end of the country where it can’t interfere with Scottish rail services in the slightest. Or Westernhanger Racecourse Station, which is also in Kent, and which closed sometime in the 1960s.

What’s more, while my clever theory explains why ScotRail has pre-recorded versions of “London Paddington” and “London Marylebone” (but not, say, “London Fenchurch Street”), it is utterly silent on the fact it also feels the need to the assorted heritage steam railways of southern England. Seriously, why on earth would passengers in Glasgow ever need to know about events on the Bluebell or Watercress railways?

Some of the announcements are just plain weird

Okay, I can get my head around “please note that today this train is in reverse formation” – sometimes you might want to tell the six first class passengers that they’re at the wrong end of the platform. “Megatrain accommodation can be found at the rear of the train” momentarily floored me, but that turns out to be a scheme operated by Megabus to offer cheap tickets on under-used services.

But “Please ignore the following announcements”? Under what circumstances are you ever going to make announcements, having just told the general public to ignore them? What on earth is happening here?

In real emergencies, they change announcers anyway 

The vast, vast majority of these announcements are by the same well-spoken Scottish woman (I’m terrible at accents, but if pushed I’d guess she was from somewhere near Edinburgh). Four, though, are not her. It’s actually the same announcement, repeated at four different volumes: “Attention please! Please leave the station immediately.” That one is the voice of an Englishman.

He sounds familiar, so my guess is there’s some legal requirement to use the same announcement across the network. But it does accidentally suggest that when things get serious you need to get a bloke in, and preferably not a Scottish bloke, either.

The most popular bit might be about delays

It’s “We are sorry to announce that the”. I’d write “Tsh! Says it all, doesn’t it?” or something at this point, except that the reason I said “might” in the previous heading is because I’m going off a comment in a column of the spreadsheet called “notes” and so can’t work out if this is a factual comment about this genuinely being the most widely used file, or just someone making a funny joke.

Not a single announcement uses “outwith”

Poor show, ScotRail, we’re never going to get that useful Scottish word into non-Scottish usage at this rate.

Anyway, if you want to make your own Scotrail announcement – and why wouldn’t you? – you can do so via this helpful dashboard, made by Simon Willison:

Jonn Elledge is a former writer and editor at the New Statesman, as well as the founder and editor of the CityMetric website for many years (now CityMonitor.ai). He is now publishes his thoughts on The Newsletter of (Not Quite) Everything, and freelances for other publications. This piece was first published on his Newsletter.

19 comments

  1. NOT Scotrail, but on some other operators & systems, far too many “announcements” are not only repetitive & unnecessary, but unbelievably annoying.
    “Use the whole of the platform” – well, actually, what about just the bit I’m standing on?
    On the Tube … this is an X line train calling all stations to $Destination – rather than – “This is a $Destination train, eh?
    And, of course, worst of all … “See it, say it, sorted” ( The last of which invites a chorus of “stick it up ….. “)

    At the risk of being boring & repetitive, myself ….
    One day there will be a real emergency & no-one will take a blind bit of notice, because it’s only another announcement ….

  2. What a poorly-informed arrangement of guesswork — not up to the usual LR standard at all!

  3. Guest post, you see – originally written for my substack, the Newsletter of (Not Quite) Everything, which LR asked to republish

  4. Very interesting analysis, and the included destinations and train operating companies are certainly surprising!

    To possibly clarify a couple of issues you raise:

    – Glasgow Central doesn’t have any through platforms (in the high level, low level station does but is only two platform with stopping commuter services, so no express trains). And even at Edinburgh Waverley, the ‘through’ platforms rarely (or never?) have trains passing through without stopping. If a train were to go through (as I’ve seen on a non-platform line) it would be at very low speed. Though I’m no expert I can’t think of any other stations in Scotland that are likely to have more than 12 platforms.

    – The “Please ignore the following announcements” recording is probably used when they do a test of the emergency announcements (e.g. the English man announcements). I happened to be in Waverley last Sunday when they did a test of the “Attention please! Please leave the station immediately.” announcement. Unfortunately I was in WHSmith at this time, and either ignored or didn’t hear the “ignore the following announcements” (whether it was automated or not). But the emergency announcement is much louder and accompanied by flashing lights, so I _did_ notice that. I proceeded to walk to the exit ramp, stopping part way up when I noticed that no one else, including staff, was doing anything. When I asked a gateline staff they confirmed it had been a test.

  5. @Greg T I rather hate the use of “terminate at” rather than “going to”.

    However on the tube it is sometimes necessary to say the line name because there are many lines from the same platform (all those that share with the Circle line) and not all Met and Liz Line trains stop at all stations.

    Met timetables says Uxbridge – Baker Street “some trains run non-stop between Harrow-on-the-Hill and Finchley Road during the morning peak, Watford – Baker Street “some trains run non-stop between Harrow-on-the-Hill and Finchley Road during the morning peak, and between Wembley Park and Harrow-on-the-Hill during the evening peak). As we know from the other page Liz line trains sometimes don’t stop at Acton Main Line, West Ealing, Handwell ad Southall.

    Also Turhanm Green is now “Services or access at this station is subject to variation: check before you travel.” because it has an all-day service for both District and Picadilly lines.

    Late-running Overground trains sometimes don’t stop at Hoxton and Haggerston to make up their delay time running to Highbury & Islington. And Overground trains to/from Chingford don’t stop at Cambridge Heath and London Fields.

  6. “ice preventing trains getting electricity from the third rail”! Glasgow Subway aside (which has no open sections apart from the depot), all ScotRail electrification is at 25kv overhead. So I am not sure why this announcement is needed – unless the Cathcart Circle is to be extended to Waterloo?

  7. I concur with previous commenters, worthy of a link perhaps but not the full article.

    Re the sea flooding the railway: googling for Saltcoats would be enlightening, and no doubt other locations

  8. Great article – thanks for including it here, since otherwise I’d not have seen the original. It’s good to have something light-hearted (but still transport related and relevant) in amongst the more usual articles. Not sure why other people felt the need to moan – if they’re not interested in a particular article, they can always skip it.

  9. Presumably the emergency announcement is an English man precisely because you want it to stand out from all the other announcements which are by a Scottish female.

    I’d guess the 7 and 12 minutes to do with minimum interchange times?

    The random stations and TOC are presumably dummy data so you can do testing in public. Eg you don’t want to test your PA announcing actual trains/destinations that people might be relying on.

    I always loved(?) the announcements at Birmingham New Street which after five minutes were “sorry for the delay”. After fifteen were “very sorry for the delay”. And after 30 mins were “extremely sorry for the delay”.

  10. Apologies if someone else has mentioned this but ““Please ignore the following announcements”? Under what circumstances are you ever going to make announcements, having just told the general public to ignore them? What on earth is happening here?” – probably for testing the system, particularly emergency messages!

  11. Delighted to see Jonn Elledge, a man whose emails I actually pay to receive, popping up here, And it is fitting for (London) Reconnections.

  12. With Frankie Goes To Hollywood in mind, I wonder if they have their message on the system, “Mine is the last voice you will ever hear”.

  13. Wonder if those random south England stations and train operators are used for testing systems, perhaps to be used after the “please ignore” announcement, to avoid anyone in the station getting confused about places they might actually be going to.

  14. “… you can apparently also say “7 minutes” and “12 minutes” too? No other numbers, just those. Weird.”
    I love this; used exactly these timings whenever my children asked “How long is it now…?” in the car. Obviously related it to something faintly relevant such as next town, where we turn off the motorway, etc. My family now use it with the next generation!

  15. “… increments of one minute until they hit five, then five minutes until they hit 55 … you can apparently also say ‘7 minutes’ and ‘12 minutes’ too …”

    So isn’t the sequence 1, 2, 3, 4 – then 5, 7½, 10, 12½, 15 – then 20, 25, 30, etc? Except that “… delayed by approximately seven and a half minutes …” is too wordy (and probably spuriously precise), so 7½ and 12½ have been rounded down to 7 and 12 respectively?

    It was a great article – thanks!

  16. Thanks for opportunity to create “sheep on the railway should cross via the footbridge to … ” – more seriously, despite some scepticism from others, i can actually use this in work to explain to colleagues just how many different combinations of phrases have to be supported, and in our case (outside UK), we have to support four languages ….

Comments are closed.