Friday Reads – 16 March 2018

Welcome to Reconnections’ Friday Reads. This week’s lineup:

Check out our most popular articles:

And some of our other sections:

If you have something you feel we should read or include in a future list, please email [email protected].

8 comments

  1. Sorry to bring this up again, but please could you provide an update on when the next printed magazine will be sent to subscribers, assuming it hasn’t been abandoned?

  2. Hello CG – nope not abandoned. But ‘long delayed’ for some personal health reasons behind the scenes.

    Good news is that they’re now sorted, so my piece on German WW2 railways, Tony Badsey-Ellis’ piece on London monorails and a whole lot more will now soon see the light of day.

    We’re writing now, then we need to layout and get printed, so it’ll be a couple of months but then we’ll be back into a regular cycle after that.

    My fault rather than the teams – I realised the other day that by not saying anything outside of the meetups I’d fallen foul of the very thing I’d moaned about SouthEastern doing – assuming that the solution is just around the corner so not sharing information!

    Meanwhile, back “on topic”, I’ve added a quick short post on Elizabeth line fares separate to our regular link roundup. That seemed something that was likely to spawn enough discussion it was worth posting on its own.

    JB

  3. It was interesting to read about the on-demand bus stops in Paris. Toronto was doing this for lone passengers after 9.00pm in 2004. I suggested it to my local council then but it was ignored.
    But it is a simple and cheap way to improve safety.

  4. @John Thorne

    Specifically the Toronto on demand night bus stop program is available only to women (and hopefully for children, as it gets dark early here in winter, around 4.40 pm at winter equinox, and kids returning from afterschool programs, or evening movies, should also be safe).

  5. NYC Subway Operating Costs – surely those metrics don’t tell you anything until you show cost per passenger km or something similar.

  6. @LBM. The first image in the article show the operating costs per mile, and asks why. You could have two identical metros in terms of length and layout etc, however one has twice the demand and therefore has twice the level of service. with the resultant doubling of trains required (and maintanence), increase in track wear, doubling of drivers required etc etc.

  7. Sorry to put this here … re earlier comment on the LU magazine, how can I inform you that my address has changed? Very much looking forward to the next edition.

Comments are closed.