A Look Under Kingsway

Our previous excursion into the disused City Widened Lines beneath Smithfield prompted a certain amount of thought. The opportunity arose thanks to the need to carry out compensation grouting ahead of the passage of the Crossrail TBMs below, leading to the Line’s being temporarily occupied by Crossrail themselves as a worksite. Given the length and route of the Crossrail tunnels therefore, and the likely need for grouting elsewhere, what other sites within the City might this present a rare chance to take a closer look at?

It was Crossrail themselves who swiftly spotted a similar opportunity and helpfully arranged access – the Kingsway Tram Tunnel.

As with the Widened Lines, the new Crossrail tunnels will pass at depth beneath Kingsway, with a crossover connection also present. Strengthening the ground within the immediate area of Southampton Row is thus required in order to mitigate any risk of subsidence. The presence of the remains of the Kingsway Tram Tunnel is thus rather fortuitous, as it allows two shafts to be driven down from within through which the grouting can be carried out, without disruption to one of London’s key thoroughfares above.

The extent of the compensation grouting

The extent of the compensation grouting, courtesy Ianvisits

The route of Crossrail

Photographing the walls of site offices is an LR tradition. This map gives a nice overview of the central section of Crossrail (save to your computer for the large version)

Construction of the first of those shafts is now under way, and photos of this can be found below. Perhaps more importantly, the relatively early stage of the works also meant an opporunity to push on further into the remains of the northern section of the Tunnel to Holborn Tram station and beyond.

As with the Widened Lines, Ianvisits was our companion on this trip. The Indiana to our Henry Jones, his look at the Tunnel can be found here, and is well worth a read.

An Opportunity for Joined Up Thinking

Before looking at the state of the Tunnel today, it is perhaps worth providing some historical context. As the end of the Nineteenth Century approached, London County Council began to look at a variety of options for sorting out the increasingly congested streets north of Waterloo Bridge and above the Strand. After much debate, and in the face of some opposition, it was decided that a radical and complete reworking of the Holborn area was necessary, with a considerable amount of the existing area demolished in order to make way for a new, wide thoroughfare stretching from High Holborn in the north down to the Embankment. This plan would create Kingsway and Aldwych, as we know them today.

The full scheme

The full scheme

From a relatively early stage, the Council realised that the construction of this new thoroughfare presented a rare opportunity to carry out some major transport works as well, allowing tram traffic and road traffic to be properly separated. A shallow tram tunnel – the first of its kind – could be built beneath the new thoroughfare, with much of the work being carried out using a cut-and-cover method during the schemes works.

Initially the LCC’s plans for the tunnel were rather ambitious. They argued for a scheme that would see the tram tunnel run as far as Westminster. Ultimately, however, a more limited scheme was agreed, with the track dipping below the surface just south of Theobalds road and then proceeding beneath Kingsway and Aldwych with stations at both the Holborn and Aldwych ends. Indeed even as construction on this section of the tunnel proceeded, there was considerable debate about the ultimate destination of the tunnel in the south. As late as 1905, argument continued, and indeed the first services run through the tunnel in 1906 terminated at Aldwych.

Finally, it was agreed that the tunnel would curve under the strand and link through to the Embankment by Waterloo Bridge, with a proposed station on the corner of Wellington Street and the Strand becoming a casualty in the design process. This section finally opened, allowing through traffic for the first time, in 1908. As with the most northerly section at Southampton Row, two iron-ringed tubes were bored were the tunnel passed beneath existing roads.

Construction of this final section of tunnel was not without incident. The route of the tunnel meant passing beneath Wellington Road, the viaduct-based road which connects Waterloo Bridge to the Strand. During excavation of the tunnel it was discovered that piers on which the viaduct had been constructed simply sat on a wooden raft which floated on the Thames mud beneath. The replacement of this with piers bedded on a heavy duty concrete frame was quickly carried out, at some cost in both money and time.

Ultimately, tram services ran through the tunnel until 1952, when the replacement of trams services through the tunnel with diesel bus services made it redundant.

Almost immediately, the possibility of using the tunnel (or a section of it) for road traffic began to be mooted. It was not until 1957, however, that a concrete plan for this began to emerge. By 1964 this had finally come to fruition, with the southern section of the tunnel becoming the Strand Underpass.

The Strand Underpass

The Strand Underpass, picture by Nevilley

Heading into the tunnel

The section of tunnel that remains today is the “orphaned” Northern end, stretching from where the tunnel dips beneath the surface on Southampton Row almost as far as the site of the old Aldwych tram stop to the south. As can be seen from the photos below it has been (and indeed still is) used largely as a convenient Central London storage space by both Camden and Westminster Councils up until the current day.

The tunnel entrance, 1906 - 1920

The tunnel entrance, 1906 – 1920, from the collection of London Transport Museum, copyright TfL

The view down into the Tunnel on Southampton Row

The view down into the Tunnel on Southampton Row today

As can be seen above, the gradient on the northern entrance is rather steep – 1:10 – which caused a certain amount of trouble for the earlier trams that used the tunnel. The walls of the tunnel portal are lined with white ceramic tiles. The original plan was for these to run throughout the tunnel, but ultimately only the portal and the station spaces were tiled in order to save money.

The view back up the ramp

The view back up the ramp

The tiled portal

The tiled portal

Track and cobbles remain in place at various points

Track and cobbles remain in place at various points

The tunnel entrance

The tunnel entrance

Eagle eyes will have noticed that the tunnel entrance today differs greatly from that pictured in the early twentieth century photo above. This is more obvious in the close up image below, in which the original iron tubes are clearly visible.

A closer view of the entrance

A closer view of the entrance

This change came about due to the need to rework the tunnel to accomodate double-decker trams. There had been considerable pressure from various parties to “future-proof” the tunnel for double-decker trams at the time of its construction. This would have required the tunnel to be built to a height of 17ft rather than 14ft, but it was decided that the increased cost and complexity this added to the project outweighed the benefits. By 1929, however, it had become clear that the tunnel needed to accomodate double-deckers to be effective value for money and a large conversion project was undertaken. This saw the old iron tube sections removed, the entrances reworked and the tunnel floor dropped by several feet. Double-decker services began to run through the tunnel from 1931 onwards.

The tunnel pictured at some point between 1945 and 1951

The tunnel pictured at some point between 1945 and 1951, from the collection of London Transport Museum, copyright TfL

The Crossrail shaft sits just within the tunnel entrance. It’s a tight space, with relatively little room to manoeuvre.

Inside the entrance

Inside the entrance

The Crossrail shaft

The Crossrail shaft, courtesy ianvisits.

The view down the shaft

The view down the shaft

Crossrail’s presence within the tunnel provides a short stretch of illuminated tunnel section. This gives a good idea of the size of the tunnel, and also the roofwork – which includes a support frame obviously added at some point after the tunnel closed to tram traffic.

Looking down the tunnel towards Holborn

Looking down the tunnel towards Holborn

The tunnel roof

The tunnel roof

Moving beyond the Crossrail site, the tunnel floor dips slightly. This is due to the presence of the Fleet sewer above, which was too costly to divert. Beyond this point, the lighting becomes much more limited. Indeed by Holborn station and beyond the tunnel becomes a dark, dusty place. Most of the photos beyond this point are lit largely by flash, although some with natural light levels are included to give context.

The dip, looking back towards the entrance

The dip, looking back towards the entrance

The dark descends once past the Crossrail worksite

The dark descends once past the Crossrail worksite, climbing towards Holborn tram station

Much of the structure of Holborn station still remains, although it is now largely unlit. It’s an island platform, with track on both sides. The tiling has long since gone, although the advertising spaces are still visible. Much of the space is now occupied by stockpiled municipal furniture.

The station in 1933

The station in 1933, from the collection of London Transport Museum, copyright TfL

Holborn Tram Station looking south

Holborn Tram Station looking south

The view further down the platform

The view further down the platform

The platforms, being used for storage

The platforms, being used for storage

Looking North along the wall

Looking North along the wall, where the track splits to go round the Island platform. It would have been a tight space for trams.

It’s a long platform, with two narrow entrances granting access to it from the street above.

The Northern Entrance to Holborn Tram Station

The Northern Entrance to Holborn Tram Station

The same view without flash, to show the natural light level

The same view without flash, to show the natural light level

The southern entrance

The southern entrance

The southern entrance now carries a "fire exit only" sign

The southern entrance now carries a “fire exit only” sign

Old tram rails

Old tram rails

A small office space sits below the northern entrance, now stripped of all its contents.

The small office at Holborn

The small office at Holborn

Moving beyond Holborn station, the tunnel proceeds on the same level in a straight line towards Aldwych. A dark space filled with a wide variety of municipal furniture and paving supplies, torchlight reveals the occasional pile of bollards or road signs.

Proceeding south towards Aldwych

Proceeding south towards Aldwych

Street signs and other items clutter the tunnel

Street signs and other items clutter the tunnel

Looking back towards Holborn

Looking back towards Holborn

The southern end of what remains of the tunnel is occupied by a power substation. This will shortly be permanently relocated out of the tunnel in order to allow the second grouting shaft to be dug out. It effectively marks the point beyond which further travel is not possible, where the remains of the tunnel meet the Strand Underpass, roughly at the point where Aldwych station once sat.

Approaching the substation

Approaching the substation

The Substation

The substation

Looking back from the substation, the tunnel stretches off north into the darkness.

The view north from the substation

The view north from the substation

The same view, with natural light levels

The same view, with natural light levels

Overall, it’s clear that a considerable amount of space still remains beneath Kingsway, despite the repurposing of the southern end of the Kingsway tunnel as the Strand Underpass. That said, it is perhaps one of the few areas of forgotten transport infrastructure beneath the centre of the City for which no practical transport use could arguably be found. Whether that means it is destined to remain a storage space forever though, will be interesting to see.

57 comments

  1. To where did the excavated bits of tramrail go? I’ve been trying, with no luck to obtain 15cm for years!

  2. I went through it as a child with my parents going to Australia House to get emigration papers. Unfortunstely that didnt happen my Father became ill soon after. I can remember the lower deck lights and the grinding brakes motors and wheels. Strange to think that today i am working on a new tramway proposal for Manchester, but have always been fascinated by the Kingsway subway.

  3. Previous correspondent is correct. Trolleybus 1379 had its platform altered to the offside in order to be tried out in the subway. The experiment was not pursued and the ‘bus re-converted but with a slightly odd shape viewed from the rear. My dad gave me a ride on the embankment trams but only in ’52, after the subway had closed. I did get my tramrail but thro’ the kindness of Midland Metro and Balfour Beattie. If they are to replace the tram rails, surely not the section of conduit they dug up? Those yolks holding the T-bars and the rails went really deep and were set in hard concrete…

  4. Ken Blacker’s two volume work on the London Trolleybus devotes an entire chapter to No 1379. It was neither converted to, nor deconverted from, having an offside platform but was built in May 1939 with doors on both sides and still had them when it went to the scrapyard in March 1955.
    It made only two round trips through the subway, both on the night of August 13th 1939, with a trip to Islington under the wires in between to recharge the batteries. (The subway only had conduit supply). On both trips the batteries died before it could get up the ramp onto Southampton Row, and it had to be towed out .

    Here it is in post-war service on the 617
    https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5268/5636112444_ea64b01d9e_b.jpg

    (It must be post-war as the building in the background was built to replace one flattened by a V2 rocket)

  5. The subway did only have conduit supply, but even if it had had overhead equipment, the trolleybus would have needed to tow a skate for the earth return. Perhaps they should have tried a conduit skate?

  6. They may have planned to use a skate in later tests, but the initial ones were primarily to test clearances – and highlighted a number of problems.

    Further tests were planned for the following month, but certain problems concerning Poles intervened.

  7. Timbeau. A minor correction. 1379 didn’t have doors on both sides, only on the off-side. There was an ordinary open platform on the near side

  8. I stand corrected – the other difference from the rest of the batch was that the staircase was set slightly further forward than normal, and was straight. Seating capacity was two less than normal.

Comments are closed.